Two distinct superconducting states controlled by orientations of local wrinkles in LiFeAs

ORAL

Abstract

For iron-based superconductors, the phase diagrams under pressure or strain exhibit emergent phenomena between unconventional superconductivity and other electronic orders, varying in different systems. As a stoichiometric superconductor, LiFeAs has no structure phase transitions or entangled electronic states, which manifests an ideal platform to explore the pressure or strain effect on unconventional superconductivity. Here, we observe two types of superconducting states controlled by orientations of local wrinkles on the surface of LiFeAs. Using scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy, we find type-I wrinkles enlarge the superconducting gaps and enhance the transition temperature, whereas type-II wrinkles significantly suppress the superconducting gaps. The vortices on wrinkles show a C2 symmetry, indicating the strain effects on the wrinkles. By statistics, we find that the two types of wrinkles are categorized by their orientations. Our results demonstrate that the local strain effect with different directions can tune the superconducting order parameter of LiFeAs very differently, suggesting that the band shifting induced by directional pressure may play an important role in iron-based superconductivity.

*This work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0308500, 2018YFA0305700, 2016YFA0401000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11888101, 52072401, 61888102, 51991340, 11820101003, 11921004, 11674371), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB28000000, XDB07000000).

Publication: Nat Commun 12, 6312 (2021).

Presenters

  • Lu Cao

    • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Authors

  • Lu Cao

    • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Wenyao Liu

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Geng Li

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Physics
  • Guangyang Dai

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Qi Zheng

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Yuxin Wang

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Kun Jiang

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Shiyu Zhu

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Physics
  • Li Huang

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Physics
  • Lingyuan Kong

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Fazhi Yang

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Xiancheng Wang

    • Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Roger Guzman

    • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    • School of Physical Sciences and CAS Key Laboratory of Vacuum Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing, China
  • Xiao Lin

    • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Jiangping Hu

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Changqing Jin

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Hong Ding

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Hongjun Gao

    • Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Physics
    • Institute of Physics & University of Chinese Academy of Sciences