Quantum optimal control in a generalized rotating frame

ORAL

Abstract

With superconducting-qubit gate operations now routinely approaching their speed limits, strategies for mitigating the impact of coherent errors are increasingly important. In this talk, we introduce a method for quantum optimal control in an extended Hilbert space, where the quantum dynamics becomes exactly differentiable without needing rotating-wave approximations. Our representation exploits an expansion of the quantum controls in a physically motivated basis, which conveniently leads to waveforms with a bounded frequency spectrum. We perform numerical simulations using our optimal-control method and demonstrate improved two-qubit gate fidelities for typical transmon- and fluxonium-qubit architectures. We show, for instance, that our numerical technique rediscovers known pulse schedules for minimizing leakage, e.g., DRAG for single qubits, and generalizes such a strategy to larger systems. We extend our optimal-control approach to Liouville space and discuss the impact of dissipation and finite amplitude and frequency resolution on the two-qubit gate fidelities.

*This research was funded in part by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under contract no. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 within the High-Coherence Multilayer Superconducting Structures for Large Scale Qubit Integration and Photonic Transduction program (QISLBNL); and by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.

Presenters

  • Agustin Di Paolo

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Authors

  • Agustin Di Paolo

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  • William P Banner

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
  • Kaidong Peng

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
    • MIT
  • Jeffrey A Grover

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • William D Oliver

    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), MIT Lincoln Laboratory
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Lincoln Laboratory