A 3-tier stack for 3D integration of superconducting quantum systems – part 2: qubit design and performance
ORAL
Abstract
A key goal of any extensible architecture for quantum information processing is to enhance connectivity and functionality while preserving qubit coherence. We describe the design and operation of high-coherence superconducting qubits in a 3D-integrated 3-tier stack that utilizes an interposer with superconducting through-silicon vias (TSVs) to connect qubits to multi-level superconducting routing while preserving qubit performance by isolating qubits from lossy dielectrics in the routing tier. Fabrication processes that produce high-coherence qubits are used on both the qubit and interposer tiers. Readout and control circuitry, including resonators and qubit control lines, are located on the interposer tier. All components are accessed using TSVs in the interposer tier and bump bonds between the tiers.
*This work is supported by a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Quantum Systems Accelerator; the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Energy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, or the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
–
Publication:D. Yost et al., Solid-state qubits integrated with superconducting through-silicon vias, npj Quantum Information 6, 59 (2020)
D. Rosenberg et al., Solid-state qubits: 3D integration and packaging, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21, 72 (2020).
C.F. Hirjibehedin, D.-R.W. Yost et al., in preparation
Presenters
Cyrus F Hirjibehedin
MIT Lincoln Lab
Authors
Cyrus F Hirjibehedin
MIT Lincoln Lab
Donna-Ruth W Yost
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
MIT - Lincoln Laboratory
Justin L Mallek
MIT Lincoln Lab
Danna Rosenberg
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
Rabindra Das
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
MIT Lincoln Lab
Kate Azar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Katrina Sliwa
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
MIT Lincoln Lab
Thomas M Hazard
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Vladimir Bolkhovsky
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Evan Golden
MIT LIncoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
David K Kim
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Jeffrey Knecht
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Alexander Melville
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Bethany M Niedzielski
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Meghan Schuldt
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
MIT Lincoln Lab
Ravi Rastogi
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Kyle Serniak
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Steven J Weber
MIT Lincoln Lab
Wayne Woods
MIT Lincoln Lab
Scott Zarr
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Andrew J Kerman
MIT Lincoln Lab
William D Oliver
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Lincoln Laboratory