A 3-tier stack for 3D integration of superconducting quantum systems – part 1: Interposer tier with superconducting TSVs and qubits
ORAL
Abstract
Complex systems of superconducting qubits present engineering challenges for robust control and readout of multi-qubit systems. We have developed a 3D integration approach that utilizes a 3-tier stack to provide access to multi-level superconducting circuitry. The 3D integrated stack is composed of a top qubit tier, a bottom superconducting multichip module (SMCM) tier, and an intermediate interposer tier. The interposer separates the qubits from the SMCM tier, reducing the impact of lossy dielectrics in the multilevel wiring of the SMCM on the coherence of the qubits. An active interposer tier with superconducting TSVs provides both connectivity and enhanced functionality with additional layers for resonators, qubits, and novel qubit devices which utilize the TSVs. We will discuss fabrication and characterization of our 3-tier stack platform for control and readout of multi-qubit systems.
*This work is supported by a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Quantum Systems Accelerator; the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Energy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, or the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
–
Publication:D. Yost et al., Solid-state qubits integrated with superconducting through-silicon vias, npj Quantum Information 6, 59 (2020) D. Rosenberg et al., Solid-state qubits: 3D integration and packaging, IEEE Microwave Magazine 21 (8), 72 (2020). C.F. Hirjibehedin, and D. Yost, et al., in preparation
Presenters
Donna-Ruth W Yost
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
MIT - Lincoln Laboratory
Authors
Donna-Ruth W Yost
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
MIT - Lincoln Laboratory
Cyrus F Hirjibehedin
MIT Lincoln Lab
Justin L Mallek
MIT Lincoln Lab
Danna Rosenberg
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
Rabindra Das
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
MIT Lincoln Lab
Kate Azar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Katrina Silwa
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Thomas M Hazard
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Vladimir Bolkhovsky
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Evan Golden
MIT LIncoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
David K Kim
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Jeffrey Knecht
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Alexander Melville
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Bethany M Niedzielski
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Meghan Schuldt
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
MIT Lincoln Lab
Ravi Rastogi
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Kyle Serniak
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Steven J Weber
MIT Lincoln Lab
Wayne Woods
MIT Lincoln Lab
Scott Zarr
MIT Lincoln Lab
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Andrew J Kerman
MIT Lincoln Lab
William D Oliver
Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Lincoln Laboratory