Frank Isakson Prize for Optical Effects in Solids (2020): Composite Materials and Metamaterials for Nonlinear Optics
· Invited
Abstract
There has been great interest in the development of composite optical materials and metamaterials for applications in modern optical technology. Materials with a strongly nonlinear response are required for many applications, and especially in photonics for processes such as all-optical switching. It is of particular interest to design composite structures that enhance the value of the third-order optical susceptibility chi-3. Under ideal conditions, this composite chi-3 can exceed the chi-3 values of the constituents of the composite [1]. This enhancement of the nonlinear response can be understood as a consequence of the judicious use of local field effects [2]. Enhanced nonlinear response of composite materials and structures has been demonstrated for a variety of materials [3-8]. Recent work has shown an additional means of enhancing the nonlinear optical response by making use of a material that possesses a vanishingly small electric permittivity at the wavelength of interest. Such materials are known as epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) materials [9], and they have been observed to display extremely large nonlinear response [10], both on their own or when incorporated into metasurfaces [11]. These materials hold great promise for high-speed, all-optical switching applications.
[1] J. E. Sipe and R.W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1614, 1992.
[2] J. J. Maki, R.W. Boyd, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 972, 1991.
[3] G. L. Fischer, R.W. Boyd, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1871, 1995.
[4] R. L. Nelson and R.W. Boyd, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2417, 1999.
[5] N. N. Lepeshkin, R.W. Boyd, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 123902 2004.
[6] J. E.Heebner and R. W. Boyd, Opt. Lett. 24, 847, 1999.
[7] J.E. Heebner, R.W. Boyd, et al., Opt. Letters 29, 769 (2004).
[8] R. W. Boyd and J. E. Heebner, Applied Optics, 40, 5742-7, 2001.
[9] N. Kinsey et al., Optica 2, 616 (2015).
[10] M. Z. Alam, I. D. Leon, R.W. Boyd, Science 352, 795 (2016).
[11] M. Z. Alam, R.W. Boyd et al., Nature Photonics 12, 79–83 (2018).
[1] J. E. Sipe and R.W. Boyd, Phys. Rev. A 46, 1614, 1992.
[2] J. J. Maki, R.W. Boyd, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 972, 1991.
[3] G. L. Fischer, R.W. Boyd, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1871, 1995.
[4] R. L. Nelson and R.W. Boyd, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2417, 1999.
[5] N. N. Lepeshkin, R.W. Boyd, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 123902 2004.
[6] J. E.Heebner and R. W. Boyd, Opt. Lett. 24, 847, 1999.
[7] J.E. Heebner, R.W. Boyd, et al., Opt. Letters 29, 769 (2004).
[8] R. W. Boyd and J. E. Heebner, Applied Optics, 40, 5742-7, 2001.
[9] N. Kinsey et al., Optica 2, 616 (2015).
[10] M. Z. Alam, I. D. Leon, R.W. Boyd, Science 352, 795 (2016).
[11] M. Z. Alam, R.W. Boyd et al., Nature Photonics 12, 79–83 (2018).
–
Presenters
-
Robert Boyd
- University of Ottawa and University of Rochester