Quantum optimization experiments with advanced mixers and controls
ORAL
Abstract
Modern quantum optimization methods feature quantum circuits with partially-ordered modular levels, such as the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz1. For QAOA to work in practice on NISQ devices, it must extract value from quantum effects despite daunting fidelity degradation due to noise2. Our experiments on a Rigetti processor, featuring these kind of algorithms, employ calibrated parametric CZ3 and XY4,5 gates, as well as analog-controlled phases between qubit pairs programmed with a low-level pulse design language (Quilt). We show experimental benchmark results on a 32-qubit chip for circuits related to hard-constrained scheduling problems as well as MaxCut.
1Hadfield et al. 2019. From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz. Algorithms 12(2)
2Marshall et al. 2020. Characterizing local noise in QAOA circuits. arXiv:2002.11682
3Caldwell et al. 2018. Parametrically activated entangling gates using transmon qubits. PRApplied 10(3):034050
4Abrams et al. 2019. Implementation of the XY interaction family with calibration of a single pulse. arXiv:1912.04424
5Wang et al. 2020. XY mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz. PRA 101(1), 012320
1Hadfield et al. 2019. From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz. Algorithms 12(2)
2Marshall et al. 2020. Characterizing local noise in QAOA circuits. arXiv:2002.11682
3Caldwell et al. 2018. Parametrically activated entangling gates using transmon qubits. PRApplied 10(3):034050
4Abrams et al. 2019. Implementation of the XY interaction family with calibration of a single pulse. arXiv:1912.04424
5Wang et al. 2020. XY mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz. PRA 101(1), 012320
*This work is supported by the DARPA ONISQ Program and NASA.
–
Presenters
-
Davide Venturelli
- NASA Ames Research Center