Superconductor Energy-Gap Symmetry Determination using Multi-Atom Quasiparticle Interference Imaging
ORAL
Abstract
A detailed knowledge of symmetry of superconducting gap Δα(k), for all momenta k on Fermi surface of each band α is required for a complete understanding of complex superconductors. Numerous techniques exist for determining |Δα(k)| but few to measure the sign of Δα(k). Recently, a new technique was introduced where energy- and phase-resolved Fourier analysis of quasiparticle interference images identifies whether the wavevectors connect Δα(k) of same-sign or opposite-sign. But the reliance on precise single impurity atom location for phase accuracy renders this technically difficult. We introduce a generalized technique which can be used with multiple impurities. We show its validity by comparing results of our technique with FeSe where s± Δα(k) symmetry is established. To exemplify utility, we apply our technique on LiFeAs and find that scattering interference between the hole- and electron-pockets indicates opposite sign.
*P.C.C. and A.B. acknowledge Ames lab United States Department of Energy DE-AC02-07CH11358. RS acknowledges NSF MRSEC program (DMR-1719875). P.J.H. and M.A.S. acknowledge NSF-DMR-1849751; J.C.S.D. acknowledges Moore Foundation’s EPiQS GBMF9457, Royal Society R64897, Science Foundation Ireland SFI 17/RP/5445 and from the European Research Council DLV-788932.
–
Presenters
Rahul Sharma
Cornell University
Quantum Materials Center, University of Maryland; Laboratory of Atomic and Solid States Physics, Cornell University
University of Maryland, College Park
Authors
Rahul Sharma
Cornell University
Quantum Materials Center, University of Maryland; Laboratory of Atomic and Solid States Physics, Cornell University
University of Maryland, College Park
Andreas Kreisel
Universität Leipzig
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Leipzig
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leipzig University
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Leipzig
University of Leipzig
Miguel Antonio Sulangi
Department of Physics, University of Florida
Jakob Böker
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum; Institute of Physics, Kazan Federal University
Andrey Kostin
Cornell University
Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University
Milan Allan
Leiden University
Leiden Institute of Physics, Leiden University
Hiroshi Eisaki
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Anna Boehmer
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Institute for Quantum Materials and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Ames Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Paul C. Canfield
Ames Laboratory/Iowa State University
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University
Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Ames
Ames Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy; Department of Physics, Iowa State University
Ilya Eremin
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Ruhr Univ Bochum
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum; Institute of Physics, Kazan Federal University
James C Davis
Cornell University
Department of Physics, University of Oxford
University College Cork
Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University; Department of Physics, University College Cork; Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids; Clarend
Peter Hirschfeld
University of Florida
Department of Physics, University of Florida
Physics, University of Florida
univ of Florida
Peter Oliver Sprau
University of California, San Diego
Advanced Development Center, ASML
Advanced Development Center, ASML; Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University