Large negative thermal Hall response in the pseudogap phase of cuprates

ORAL

Abstract

The nature of the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors remains a mystery. In that phase, the Fermi surface is transformed even though translational symmetry is not broken [1]. A possible explanation is a spin-liquid-like state with topological order [2].
The thermal Hall conductivity κxy has recently emerged as a powerful probe of insulators with unusual forms of magnetism, such as quantum spin liquids [3] and quantum spin ice [4].
We report extensive measurements of the thermal Hall conductivity κxy in several families of cuprates across a wide range of dopings. We observe a large and negative thermal Hall response at temperatures below the pseudogap temperature T*, which appears immediately below the pseudogap critical doping p*. The negative κxy contrasts with the positive electrical Hall conductivity σxy and, moreover, the magnitude of κxy increases as doping is reduced towards p = 0, whereas σxy vanishes as the material becomes an insulator.
The negative κxy is therefore due to neutral heat carriers and it points to spin chirality [5], or perhaps topological excitations.

[1] Proust & Taillefer, ARCMP; arXiv:1804.08502 (2018).
[2] Scheurer et al., PNAS (2018).
[3] Kasahara et al., Nature (2018).
[4] Hirschberger et al., Science (2015).
[5] Lee et al., PRB (2015).

Presenters

  • Gael Grissonnanche

    • University of Sherbrooke (Canada)
    • Physics, Université de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)

Authors

  • Gael Grissonnanche

    • University of Sherbrooke (Canada)
    • Physics, Université de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Anaelle Legros

    • Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
    • Physics, Université de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Sven Badoux

    • Universite de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Étienne Lefrancois

    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Victor Zatko

    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Maude le Lizaire

    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Francis Laliberte

    • Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
    • Physics, Université de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Adrien Gourgout

    • Universite de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Jianshi Zhou

    • Texas Materials Institute, University of Texas at Austin
    • University of Texas at Austin
    • Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin
    • Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas
    • University of Texas (Austin, USA)
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
  • Sunseng Pyon

    • Department of Advanced Materials, University of Tokyo
    • Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo
    • University of Tokyo (Japan)
  • Tomohiro Takayama

    • Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
    • University of Tokyo (Japan)
  • Hidenori Takagi

    • Department of Advanced Materials, University of Tokyo
    • Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
    • Physics, University of Tokyo
    • University of Tokyo (Japan)
  • Shimpei Ono

    • Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (Japan)
    • CRIEPI
    • Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan
  • Nicolas Doiron-Leyraud

    • Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
    • Universite de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)
  • Louis Taillefer

    • University of Sherbrooke (Canada)
    • Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
    • Physics, Université de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke
    • Universite de Sherbrooke (Canada)