Highly responsive ground state of PbTaSe$_2$: structural phase transition and evolution of superconductivity under pressure
ORAL
Abstract
Thermodynamic and transport studies of PbTaSe$_2$ under pressure suggest existence of two superconducting phases with the phase boundary at $\sim 0.25$ GPa at low temperatures that is defined by a very steep, first order, structural, phase transition. The structural phase transition line extends to $\sim 425$ K at ambient pressure as evidenced by transmission electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction at elevated temperatures. The new, high temperature / high pressure phase has similar crystal structure and slightly lower unit cell volume. The details of this new structute were identified based on first-principles total energy calculations.
–
Authors
Serguei Budko
Iowa State Univ Ames Laboratory
Iowa State Univ
$^A$Ames Laboratory US DOE, $^B$Department of Physics and Astronomy, $^C$Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
Ames Laboratory US DOE, and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
Ames Laboratory and Dept. of Phys. and Astro., Iowa State University
Iowa State Univ and Ames Laboratory
U. S. Kaluarachchi
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
Y. Deng
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
M. F. Besser
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
K. Sun
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
L. Zhou
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
M. C. Nguyen
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
C. Zhang
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
J. S. Schilling
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
M. J. Kramer
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
S. Jia
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
C. Z. Wang
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
K. M. Ho
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University
P. C. Canfield
Ames Laboratory, Dept. of Physics, ISU, Dept. of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, ICQM, School of Physics, Peking University