Reproducibility in plasma agriculture

ORAL

Abstract

In a survey of 1,576 scientists published in Nature,1) 90% acknowledged reproducibility crisis. The survey reported that over 70% scientists failed to reproduce others' experiments and over 50% failed to reproduce their own results. Experimental results fail reproducibility tests due to several reasons including improper documentation of methodology, considering noise as a positive finding, incomplete experimental variables, data fabrication or bias, publishing incomplete results and inappropriate statistical analysis.2) In plasma agriculture, reproducibility depends on living things such as seeds, cultivation environment, particle fluxes from plasma, and interactions between them. Based on experimental results, we identified some important factors such as seed coat color and humidity in air to realize good reproducibility.3) Information on such factors should be described in published papers as well as laboratory notebooks.

1)M. Baker, Nat. News 533, 452 (2016). 2) T. Krishna, et al., https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.239855. 3) P. Attri, et al., Sci. Rep., 11, 1 (2021).

*This work was supported partly by JSPS-KAKENHI grant numbers JP21H04451 JP20K14454. JP20H01893, JP19H05462, JP19K14700.

Publication: 1) P. Attri, et al., Sci. Rep., 11, 1 (2021).
2) M. Shiratani, et al., Proc. for ISNTP-12 and ISEHD 2022.

Presenters

  • Masaharu Shiratani

    • Kyushu University
    • Kyushu University, Japan

Authors

  • Masaharu Shiratani

    • Kyushu University
    • Kyushu University, Japan
  • Teruki Anan

    • Kyushu University
  • Takumi Nakao

    • Kyushu University
  • Takamasa Okumura

    • Kyushu University
    • Kyushu University, Japan
  • Pankaj Attri

    • Kyushu University
  • Kazunori Koga

    • Kyushu Univ
    • Kyushu University
    • Kyushu University, Japan