Plasma Streamer Propagation in the Gas Phase, Catalyst Pores and Surface DBD

ORAL  · Invited

Abstract

    Streamer discharges at atmospheric pressure have been widely used for various environmental applications, such as hydrocarbon reforming, air pollution control, greenhouse gas conversion, and nitrogen fixation. However, the propagation mechanism and the interactions between the plasma streamer and dielectrics/catalysts are rather complicated and still far from being well understood. On one hand, depending on the polarity of the applied voltage, either a negative or positive streamer can be generated, and its propagation behavior and interactions with material surfaces are very distinct. On the other hand, the discharge structure could be very different, including the gas phase, packed dielectric-barrier discharge (DBD) with catalysts, internal space in catalysts and surface DBD (SDBD).

    We have executed multiple simulations based on a two-dimensional particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo (PIC/MC) collision model, to pursue a comprehensive understanding of the plasma streamer propagation. It is found that photoionization (background electrons) plays a vital role in the positive streamer evolution and its branching nature. The Debye length is an important criterion for plasma penetration into catalyst pores, i.e. a plasma streamer can penetrate into pores if their diameter is larger than the Debye length. The surface charging plays an important role in the streamer propagation and discharge enhancement inside catalyst pores, and in the plasma distribution along the dielectric surface, whose role greatly depends on the dielectric constant of the material. 

    Both a negative and a positive streamer can be exited simultaneously on the two sides of a twin SDBD, which leads to a large discharge volume. The streamer polarity (negative/positive) can be converted when the rf voltage polarity changes. This can further promote the streamer to spread into a larger area and interact more with the dielectric/catalyst surface. 

*The financial support from Scientific Research Foundation of Dalian University of Technology (DUT19RC(3)045) and funding by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the frame of the Collaborative Research Center SFB 1316, project A5, are acknowledged. The work was partially carried out at the CalcUA core facility of the Universiteit Antwerpen.

Publication: 1] Quan-Zhi Zhang and Annemie Bogaerts. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 (2018) 035009.
[2] Quan-Zhi Zhang, Wei-Zong Wang and Annemie Bogaerts, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 (2018) 065009.
[3] Quan-Zhi Zhang and Annemie Bogaerts. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 (2018) 105013.
[4] Quan-Zhi Zhang, R T Nguyen-Smith, F Beckfeld, Yue Liu, T Mussenbrock, P Awakowicz and J Schulze. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. (2021 accepted)

Presenters

  • Quan-Zhi Zhang

    • Dalian University of Technology

Authors

  • Quan-Zhi Zhang

    • Dalian University of Technology
  • Ryan Thomas Nguyen-Smith

    • Ruhr University Bochum
  • Julian Schulze

    • Ruhr University Bochum
    • Institute of Electrical Engineering and Plasma Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
    • Ruhr Univ Bochum
    • Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany; Dalian University of Technology, China
    • Ruhr University Bochum, Dalian University of Technology
    • Ruch Univ Bochum, Germany
    • Ruhr-University Bochum
  • Florian Beckfeld

    • Ruhr University Bochum
  • Yue Liu

    • Ruhr University Bochum
    • Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
  • Thomas Mussenbrock

    • Ruhr University Bochum
    • Bochum University
    • Ruhr Univ Bochum
    • Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
    • Ruhr-University Bochum
    • Ruhr University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany
    • Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
  • Peter Awakowicz

    • Ruhr-University Bochum
    • Ruhr University Bochum
    • Ruhr Univ Bochum
    • Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
  • Annemie Bogaerts

    • University of Antwerp