Correlation spectroscopy between two $^{27}$Al$^+$ clocks

ORAL

Abstract

A comparison between highly accurate clocks, which is necessary to evaluate and verify their accuracy, requires commensurate measurement precision. While the atomic systems used as clocks have long coherence times, noise from the local oscillator often limits the measurement stability. One way to overcome this limitation is by performing correlation spectroscopy, in which a Ramsey pulse sequence derived from the same probe laser is applied to both clocks synchronously. The coherent differential frequency measurements between two atomic systems permit interrogation times beyond the laser coherence time. We report on the demonstration of correlation spectroscopy between two independent optical atomic clocks in separate systems. By removing the limitation set by the coherence time of the local oscillator, we extend the interrogation time of the two single $^{27}$Al$^+$ ion quantum-logic clocks from 150~ms to several seconds. The corresponding reduction in quantum projection noise limit results in a frequency comparison instability significantly lower than is possible for incoherent comparisons using the same local oscillator.

*This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Office of Naval Research.

–

Authors

  • May Kim

    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
    • NIST

  • E. R. Clements

    • NIST, Boulder and University of Colorado, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

  • A. M. Hankin

    • NIST, Boulder and University of Colorado, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

  • S. M. Brewer

    • NIST, Boulder and University of Colorado, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

  • J.-S. Chen

    • NIST, Boulder and University of Colorado, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

  • Chin-wen Chou

    • NIST
    • NIST, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO

  • David J Wineland

    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO; University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
    • University of Oregon

  • D. B. Hume

    • NIST, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO

  • D. R. Leibrandt

    • NIST, Boulder and University of Colorado, Boulder
    • National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO; University of Colorado, Boulder, CO